Giving Credit Where Credit is Due
I was very happy to see the Federal and Provincial governments commit the significant sum of nearly $5.4 million dollars to community recreation infrastructure spending in Scarborough Guildwood last week. The Federal and Provincial governments will each spend a total of $2.6 million dollars on six projects to benefit residents of Scarborough Guildwood.
Money for community recreation infrastructure is important because it will allow for either the expansion of physical space or improvement of existing space, which in turn will allow for enhanced community use and a greater capacity for recipients to enhance their positive impact on the community they serve.
I look forward to seeing the good work that the community organizations and facilities do be expanding will have on the Scarborough Guildwood community and think both the Ontario Liberals and Federal Conservatives each found themselves on the right track by allocating funding to support community based organizations like these.
I especially look forward to seeing the East Scarborough Boys and Girls expansion. It’s hard for people I think who aren’t from Scarborough to truly appreciate the impact that the East Scarborough Boys and Girls has on the Galloway and Kingston road community especially. In many ways the East Scarborough Boys and Girls is the very example of community based, supportive programming that is required in at-risk and lower income communities.
With the funding that Cedar Ridge will receive, it is my hope it will assist the City in ensuring that that beautiful structure which serves so many great community purposes is better preserved than the Guild Inn has been.
Below is the link to Minister Best’s Press Release on the funding.
Scarborough-Guildwood Organizations to Receive Funding For Recreational Upgrades
Below is the link to the Scarborough Mirror’s story on the annoucement. Government funding to help create more recreation space in East Scarborough
No Comments »The Great Anemometer Debate
Toronto Hydro will be hosting it’s third attempt at a community meeting for Guildwood residents to discuss the placing an anemometer off the Scarborough Bluffs to measure the strength of the wind prior to the construction of an all out industrial wind turbine project.
The first meeting Toronto Hydro scheduled was sited in a church well outside of Guildwood on a rainy night, against the advice of the local Councillor. When twice capacity showed up they were turned away and the meeting was re-scheduled.
The second meeting was held in Guildwood but was stacked with bussed in paid organizers from organizations that not only had received grants, but also organizations that Toronto Hydro’s project page encourages individuals who are interesting in knowing more about the project and wind power to visit. Those paid organizers hogged the mics and gave impassioned speeches in favour of wind energy, while their diesel school buses idled outside (buses that literally mirrored a popular bus route from Kennedy Subway station). Guildwood residents who could not stand in line for over two hours, weren’t heard because of these individuals and Peter Tabuns who thought it was a campaign event for those interested in being the leader of the third party blocked them.
This third meeting is intended for Guildwood residents. It is being held on January 20th 2009 at Sir Wilfrid Laurier CI. The same site as before. The difference this time is residents need to pre-register five days before the meeting to attend. Easy enough right? Except Guildwood residents also need to supply a pin number they were to receive as unaddressed admail from Toronto Hydro. As of January 16th – a day after the last day to register some residents confirmed to me they still have not received their notices. Even those who did receieve a notice will only be allowed to register two attendees. This is problematic for multi generational families, families with adult children at home and homes with multiple families living at one address. Those who have not registered will not be allowed to enter, regardless of residency.
Toronto Hydro has said they will extend the time for residents to register, and that is fantastic, but they have not conveyed that message through the media, no press release has been issued to recognize their error and any residents who did not receive a notice by Friday likely won’t until Monday, making it still realistically too late for them to register to attend even if they knew to call and try anyway.
Some will defend Toronto Hydro’s decision to restrict access to the meeting only to residents of Guildwood. This is not a position I would defend. I would defend Toronto Hydro if they chose to allow an open meeting, but only allowed Guildwood residents with valid ID to put questions on the floor. The City of Toronto Act, appears to like my position better than Toronto Hydro’s too.
On the City’s website “Open and closed meetings of City Council, its Committees and local boards” the City states: “Generally, the City and its local boards are required by law to give notice and hold all meetings in public.” It goes on to recognize Toronto Hydro as a local board, provides an investigation process and then goes on to say the investigation process does not apply to boards like Toronto Hydro. Toronto Hydro’s reason for closing the meeting does not meet any of the provisions provided on the City of Toronto website.
Is a meeting public if notices are never received and people are barred from entry if they do not follow a process they were not empowered to follow?
I will be covering the January 20th meeting on a day when I hoped I would be able to celebrate the acheivement of President Elect Obama and the ability his campaign had to give a breath of fresh air to American grassroots democracy. But instead, I will be at Sir Wilfrid Laurier, with hundreds of Guildwood residents, hoping to see the community given the opportunity to share their questions, opinions and comments on placing an anemometer off the Bluffs. Toronto Hydro has said the meeting can and will only be just about placing an anemometer in the lake for two years worth of study at a cost of $1 million dollars, but the intent of Toronto Hydro is considerably more than just testing the wind.
If you are a Guildwood resident, you can still register, and need to call Toronto Hydro using the information on the notice you should have received in the mail. If you have not received the notice, you can call Toronto Hydro directly at 416-204-0153 to register. If unable to register, I would encourage you to show up to speak to officials directly about being allowed to attend the meeting.
2 Comments »More Guild Inn Studio Pictures
I wanted to share these excellent pictures I received in my inbox from Guildwood area resident Carl Chalupa. Carl is a long time resident of Scarborough and like many of us has an affinity for the Scarborough Bluffs, and the Guild Inn. As someone who has taken many pictures on the site both before and after the fire, Carl was kind enough to allow me to share these pictures here. I thank him for it, and encourage anyone else with pictures or stories they would like to share to contact me at john.laforet@laforet.ca
Like many Guildwood residents, as the gate blocking access to the site came down, I began to wonder and speak to others about what should the future of the Guild Inn Studio be. Like many, I am considerably more worried about heritage as it relates to the Guild Inn than I am to monetary considerations. I believe that a very serious, thorough, unbiased review needs to be done to determine if the building can be restored using the original plans to bring it back to it’s former glory.
It is a disgrace that the City has allowed the whole site to fall into such a state of disrepair and this fire needs to serve as a warning that Guildwood could risk more of it’s history of the City of Toronto does not get on with the job of protecting the Guild Inn now.
Guild Inn Studio Before and after the Christmas Day 2008 fire.
Bench beside Guild Inn Studio
Guild Inn Studio window before and after the fire.
Chimneys after the fire.
A view inside
Burned exterior
1 Comment »
