<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John Laforet &#187; Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laforet.ca/category/environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laforet.ca</link>
	<description>John Laforet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 22:55:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Great Rally and March in Port Dover Today!</title>
		<link>http://laforet.ca/2011/08/27/great-rally-and-march-in-port-dover-today/</link>
		<comments>http://laforet.ca/2011/08/27/great-rally-and-march-in-port-dover-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 04:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Laforet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Concerns Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winds of Change Tour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haldimand Wind Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Provincial Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port Dover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toby Barrett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WInd Energy Ontario]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laforet.ca/?p=2029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was a blast to be back in Haldimand-Norfolk today as we held a BBQ, rally and march at Silver Lake with the help of the local Lions Club. Many thanks to the event organizers at Haldimand Wind Concerns, MPP Toby Barrett who came out, and the hundreds of people who joined us as well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a blast to be back in Haldimand-Norfolk today as we held a BBQ, rally and march at Silver Lake with the help of the local Lions Club. Many thanks to the event organizers at Haldimand Wind Concerns, MPP Toby Barrett who came out, and the hundreds of people who joined us as well for what was a lovely afternoon.</p>
<p>I`d also like to thank the OPP for doing the responsible thing and sending a number of officers to ensure everyone`s safety by blocking intersections as demonstrators marched by. We had a great turn out and a procession that was about half the length of the main drag in Port Dover.</p>
<p>As always the folks the fighting to protect Haldimand-Norfolk did an amazing job, and I was proud to be there with folks from all over these two counties, some living with wind turbines, others facing the threat of industrial wind development.</p>
<p>We were well received by residents and visitors in Port Dover, with many people honking in support of chants like `Oust McGuinty now` `Health studies first` and others.</p>
<p>Norfolk county knows all too well the negative impacts industrial wind development has on communities as clearly seen in Clear Creek near Long Point where a number of families have been forced from their homes. Haldimand and Norfolk face very real threats going forward, but together through continued activism and pressure I am certain we will be able to protect this very special part of Ontario.</p>
<p>Toby Barrett brought a very clear message about the PCs intention to the crowd which the crowd responded quite enthusiastically too. His strength on this issue has been a very positive influence for members of his community and something that is very appreciated locally. I think as many of his signs as ours left with people at the end of the afternoon.</p>
<p>Tomorrow it is off to Brant to help the local candidate there with motivated volunteers who want to see the government change in just 39 days.</p>
<p>It is an honour to be on the road again, visiting our friends and allies around the province on the `Winds of Change`tour for Wind Concerns Ontario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laforet.ca/2011/08/27/great-rally-and-march-in-port-dover-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Wind Concerns Ontario’s Winds of Change Tour Launched in Owen Sound”</title>
		<link>http://laforet.ca/2011/08/24/%e2%80%9cwind-concerns-ontario%e2%80%99s-winds-of-change-tour-launched-in-owen-sound%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://laforet.ca/2011/08/24/%e2%80%9cwind-concerns-ontario%e2%80%99s-winds-of-change-tour-launched-in-owen-sound%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Laforet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Concerns Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winds of Change Tour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dalton McGuinty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Liberal Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Ministry of the Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Provincial Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy in Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WInd Energy Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power Ontario]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laforet.ca/?p=1999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wind Concerns Ontario has successfully launched the latest province-wide organizing effort of 2011, this time with a strong election focus. Over the next forty or so days, Wind Concerns Ontario members in sixty seven ridings will be mobilized to actively work to defeat Liberal incumbents, and candidates in their respective ridings. I look forward to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wind Concerns Ontario has successfully launched the latest province-wide organizing effort of 2011, this time with a strong election focus. Over the next forty or so days, Wind Concerns Ontario members in sixty seven ridings will be mobilized to actively work to defeat Liberal incumbents, and candidates in their respective ridings. I look forward to personally visiting over two dozen ridings to hold rallies, canvas blitzes and other events.</p>
<p>We pulled out of Toronto last night around midnight and didn’t roll into Owen Sound until 3am. I was pleased to visit the AM 560 CFOS studio again at 9am to talk with Manny Paiva about the problems with Dalton McGuinty’s industrial wind schemes. By 10:30am over fifty members of Wind Concerns Ontario groups from around Bruce-Grey Owen Sound had come to the pavilion at the very beautiful Harrison Park to formally launch Winds of Change, talk about the importance of the coming election and the need to elect good MPPs who will represent rural Ontario.</p>
<p>Although Bill Walker was unable to attend in person, he was kind enough to send a statement to be read on his behalf to the folks who were present and it was very well received. To make it clear that Wind Concerns Ontario means business about doing its part to ensure winds of change help blow the McGuinty Liberals from Queen’s Park, many of those who came for the morning went for a canvas after lunch. </p>
<p>I had a couple of other interviews about the Winds of Change tour, followed by a quiet afternoon to catch up on Wind Concerns Ontario stuff. </p>
<p>Tomorrow Bob Rae is going to be in Owen Sound, so we’ve decided to attend his event because as a former Federal Liberal Riding President, who did not vote Liberal for the first time federally in the last election, I’m curious how he can reconcile his desire to rebuild the Federal Liberals in rural Ontario, and support the re-election of Dalton McGuinty, whose government has ended local democracy, destroyed property values, harmed human health and the environment while selling out rural Ontario largely to Ontario Liberal Party donors and industrial wind welfare recipients.<br />
If I get the chance to ask Rae, I will be sure to share how that goes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laforet.ca/2011/08/24/%e2%80%9cwind-concerns-ontario%e2%80%99s-winds-of-change-tour-launched-in-owen-sound%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Chronicle Journal: It&#8217;s Not Over Yet In Thunder Bay</title>
		<link>http://laforet.ca/2011/04/05/the-chronicle-journal-its-not-over-yet-in-thunder-bay/</link>
		<comments>http://laforet.ca/2011/04/05/the-chronicle-journal-its-not-over-yet-in-thunder-bay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 04:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Laforet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Concerns Ontario]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laforet.ca/?p=1867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brandon Walker Tuesday, April 5, 2011 &#8211; 08:00 “Houses in South Neebing — going cheap,” Anna Marchese said Monday evening while leaving city hall moments after Thunder Bay council approved an agreement with Horizon Wind to avoid a $126-million lawsuit. Marchese was one of several people who confronted councillors after the meeting to express their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>Brandon Walker</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>Tuesday, April 5, 2011 &#8211; 08:00</div>
<div>
<p>“Houses in South Neebing — going cheap,” Anna Marchese said Monday evening while leaving city hall moments after Thunder Bay council approved an agreement with Horizon Wind to avoid a $126-million lawsuit. Marchese was one of several people who confronted councillors after the meeting to express their displeasure with the decision and the way they feel they have been treated by the city.</p>
<p>The decision allows Horizon to put two of four wind turbines on the edge of the Nor’Wester Mountain escarpment. The other two must be moved back from the edge. The city was slapped with the suit after council voted to have all four turbines moved back.</p>
<p>After Monday’s meeting, Nor’Wester Mountain escarpment protection committee co-chairman Mike Payne said he believes the city looked at who had a better chance of winning a lawsuit: Horizon Wind or local citizens. The problem, he said, is “the city hired a law firm that represents wind developers and a consultant that works for wind developers. They have pro wind people giving them the legal opinion of what they should do,” Payne said.</p>
<p>Only four councillors voted against the settlement on Monday, including Mayor Keith Hobbs, who called the escarpment one of the wonders of the world. “You’re going to blast the crap out of that mountain range and we’re getting nothing out of it,” Hobbs said. “The costs to upgrade the grid will outweigh any profits we’ll get from it. This is not the kind of city I want to live in,” he said to applause from others who spoke against the project Monday.</p>
<p>John Laforet, president of Wind Concerns Ontario, addressed the eight councillors who were in the room when he spoke. Laforet, of Toronto, said the city is proposing a one-sided agreement that benefits Horizon more than Thunder Bay. He said the city might be able to get out of the agreement, citing a 2000 Supreme Court decision that Victoria, B.C.’s council wasn’t bound by the previous council’s decisions. “When your solicitor starts talking about future phases — if those are going past 2014, that is a direct violation of what is already a Supreme Court precedent. “You’re trying to get out of one lawsuit and you’re setting yourself up for another one,” Laforet said, adding, along with Hobbs, that council should take more time to make a decision.</p>
<p>“We have had many hours of meetings and we’ve met with the public,’’ said Coun. Rebecca Johnson. “We’re now at the point of asking the same questions over and over again. “At some point we owe Horizon and this community an answer,’’ said Johnson.<br />
Coun. Andrew Foulds agreed. He said if the city had to pay out even $50 million, that’s the amount spent on building roads over five years.  “I think administration has worked very hard in trying to bring us a deal in the face of the $126-million lawsuit,’’ said Foulds.<br />
“If we stood and fought we could be liable for even half of that, which means we don’t build roads for five years. That’s not the kind of risk I want to take on as a municipality,” he said.</p>
<p>Payne said the Nor’Wester protection committee members plan to speak with their lawyers about possible legal action against the City of Thunder Bay. He said he’s hoping that Horizon can’t begin the project until after the October provincial election, and that the Progressive Conservatives, who have said say they will put a moratorium on wind projects that haven’t started, form the government. “Residents in South Neebing will vote PC because they want this project to stop,” Payne said.</p>
<p>The residents also plan to fight the province. “We’re geared up to fight the renewable energy approval,’’ said Payne. “We found well over 200 errors, emissions and inconsistencies in (Horizon’s submissions to the province).”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chroniclejournal.com/content/news/local/2011/04/05/it%E2%80%99s-not-over-yet">http://www.chroniclejournal.com/content/news/local/2011/04/05/it%E2%80%99s-not-over-yet</a></p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laforet.ca/2011/04/05/the-chronicle-journal-its-not-over-yet-in-thunder-bay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thunder Bay NewsWatch: Compromise with Horizon Wind Inc. Approved</title>
		<link>http://laforet.ca/2011/04/05/thunder-bay-newswatch-compromise-with-horizon-wind-inc-approved/</link>
		<comments>http://laforet.ca/2011/04/05/thunder-bay-newswatch-compromise-with-horizon-wind-inc-approved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 04:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Laforet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Concerns Ontario]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laforet.ca/?p=1864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Jamie Smith, tbnewswatch.com By a majority decision, councillors Monday night avoided a multimillion dollar lawsuit by voting for a compromise with a wind developer. Councillors voted 8-4 in favour of a compromise with Horizon Wind Inc., effectively ending the $126 million lawsuit the company levied against the city. The vote followed seven deputations during [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1865" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://laforet.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/140095_634375581817576507.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1865" title="John Laforet Wind Concerns Ontario Thunder Bay Council" src="http://laforet.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/140095_634375581817576507-300x200.png" alt="John Laforet Giving a Deputation to Thunder Bay Council" width="300" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">John Laforet Giving a Deputation to Thunder Bay Council (Jamie Smith)</p></div>
<p>By Jamie Smith, tbnewswatch.com</p>
<p>By a majority decision, councillors Monday night avoided a multimillion dollar lawsuit by voting for a compromise with a wind developer.</p>
<p>Councillors voted 8-4 in favour of a compromise with Horizon Wind Inc., effectively ending the $126 million lawsuit the company levied against the city. The vote followed seven deputations during a committee of the whole meeting at city hall.</p>
<p>The potential 79 megawatt project on the Nor’ Wester mountains will be laid out in five phases. The first phase, called Beta, will generate a potential 16.5 megawatts of power through eight turbines, which are mainly southeast of Little Norway Road.</p>
<p>Decommissioning would be provided by the company at $20,000 per turbine after 16 years.</p>
<p>City solicitor Rosalie Evans said the deal also states the company cannot have permanent access to turbines through Loch Lomond Road until the company passed the province’s Renewable Energy Approvals.</p>
<p>&#8220;They would not actually build a road until, and unless, the project is approved by the province,&#8221; Evans said. &#8220;We would not have a road to nowhere.&#8221;</p>
<p>Until that time the company will use Little Norway Road to access the locations.<br />
Mayor Keith Hobbs said he doesn’t feel comfortable because the deal leaves him with too many unanswered questions.</p>
<p>&#8220;It was the worst decision that has ever been made in this city,&#8221; Hobbs said. &#8220;I can’t see one mistake made compounded by another&#8221;.</p>
<p>The deal states one per cent, up to 15 acres, of the total trees can be cut. But that’s still devastating to an area the mayor considers a wonder of the world. Blasting, which requires a professional engineering study, will also ruin the area, he added.</p>
<p>&#8220;Green energy is not supposed to leave a footprint and this is leaving a major boot print,&#8221; Hobbs said. &#8220;You’re gonna blast the crap out of that mountain.&#8221;</p>
<p>Coun. Ken Boshcoff agreed that the deal was a bad one. Now that certain turbines are allowed to be 185.5 metres tall instead of the original 100 metres in Horizon’s REA, people are going to be upset. The councillor added that a potential increase to the number of turbines overall will also be uncomfortable to many residents. </p>
<p> &#8221;I would think it’s a valid case for what they call righteous anger,&#8221; he said. &#8220;This city is going down a path that we will all regret.&#8221;</p>
<p>But Coun. Andrew Foulds said the city is facing a $126 million lawsuit. Even if it fought and only had to pay half of that, Thunder Bay couldn’t build new roads for five years to pay off the damages. While $20,000 per turbine might be low for some people, at least it’s something, he added.</p>
<p>&#8220;Perhaps it is lower than many people would like but it is better than nothing,&#8221; Foulds said.</p>
<p>Coun. Iain Angus, echoing Foulds’ statements, said he had to support the deal.<br />
 <br />
&#8220;Actually a fifth of that (lawsuit) would be what we paid for the hospital,&#8221; he said.<br />
Angus added that council had plenty of opportunities to raise questions and concerns, and that he believed the topics discussed Monday night had been dealt with.</p>
<p>&#8220;I’m satisfied that we have all the information we need to make a decision,&#8221; Angus said.<br />
Wind Concerns Ontario president John Laforet, one of seven opponents to make a deputation to the city, said council had to decide whether they were a municipality or a wind farm proponent.</p>
<p>The deal, Laforet believes, shows that Horizon can bully the city and get whatever they want. Laforet said the city was just avoiding one lawsuit before facing many more from residents.</p>
<p>&#8220;You’re setting yourselves up for a fight,&#8221; Laforet told council. &#8220;Residents don’t lose these fights.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mike Payne, a member of the Nor’Wester Mountain Escarpment Protection Committee said the committee is disappointed with council’s decision.</p>
<p>He said the committee will confer with their legal counsel about how to proceed, but couldn’t say whether the group plans to raise lawsuits against the city.</p>
<p>&#8220;But it’s definitely a possibility,&#8221; said Payne.</p>
<p><a href="http://tbnewswatch.com/news/140095/Approved">http://tbnewswatch.com/news/140095/Approved</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laforet.ca/2011/04/05/thunder-bay-newswatch-compromise-with-horizon-wind-inc-approved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Giant CKTG 105.3 Thunder Bay: WCO Pays Visit to Council</title>
		<link>http://laforet.ca/2011/04/05/the-giant-cktg-105-3-thunder-bay-wco-pays-visit-to-council/</link>
		<comments>http://laforet.ca/2011/04/05/the-giant-cktg-105-3-thunder-bay-wco-pays-visit-to-council/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 04:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Laforet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Concerns Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horizon Wind Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder Bay wind energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder Bay Wind Farm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laforet.ca/?p=1860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The leader of an anti-wind farm group wants City Council to change some of the clauses found in the proposed settlement with Horizon Wind.  John Laforet is the President of Wind Concerns Ontario and says council should hold off on voting on the settlement that would kill the 126 million dollar lawsuit.  Laforet thinks council needs to maintain control of the Loch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1861" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://laforet.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/wind_farm_expert.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1861" title="John Laforet" src="http://laforet.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/wind_farm_expert-300x225.jpg" alt="John Laforet - President Wind Concerns Ontario" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">John Laforet in Thunder Bay April 2011</p></div>
<p> The leader of an anti-wind farm group wants City Council to change some of the clauses found in the proposed settlement with Horizon Wind.  John Laforet is the President of Wind Concerns Ontario and says council should hold off on voting on the settlement that would kill the 126 million dollar lawsuit.  Laforet thinks council needs to maintain control of the Loch Lomond road allowance; calling it the city&#8217;s only bargaining chip.</p>
<p><a href="http://thegiantnews.blogspot.com/2011/04/wco-pays-visit-to-council.html">http://thegiantnews.blogspot.com/2011/04/wco-pays-visit-to-council.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laforet.ca/2011/04/05/the-giant-cktg-105-3-thunder-bay-wco-pays-visit-to-council/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thunder Bay Daily: Turbine Opposition Bringing in Expert</title>
		<link>http://laforet.ca/2011/04/05/thunder-bay-daily-turbine-opposition-bringing-in-expert/</link>
		<comments>http://laforet.ca/2011/04/05/thunder-bay-daily-turbine-opposition-bringing-in-expert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 04:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Laforet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Concerns Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horizon Wind Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy Approval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder Bay law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder Bay wind energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder Bay Wind Farm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder Bay wind settlement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laforet.ca/?p=1858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opponents of Horizon Wind Inc.’s plan to build turbines on the Nor’Wester mountain range are bringing in a heavy hitter on Monday in an attempt to stall council’s decision on settling a $ 126-million lawsuit with the southern Ontario company. Anna Marchese, a spokesperson with the Nor’Wester Mountain Escarpement Protection Committee said they intend to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opponents of Horizon Wind Inc.’s plan to build turbines on the Nor’Wester mountain range are bringing in a heavy hitter on Monday in an attempt to stall council’s decision on settling a $ 126-million lawsuit with the southern Ontario company. Anna Marchese, a spokesperson with the Nor’Wester Mountain Escarpement Protection Committee said they intend to present John Laforet, president of Wind Concerns Ontario, to council to ask for the delay in order for them to fully understand the impact of the agreement.</p>
<p>“The message to wind developers can’t be as simple as, “Just sue and we’ll roll over and play dead for you,” Laforet said in a release issued late Sunday. “Wind Concerns Ontario is gravely concerned about the precedent of the terms of settlement would set for the future of wind development in Thunder Bay and around Ontario. The public portion of this draft deal would deliver a significant blow to the property rights of wind project participants, citizen involvement in the decision-making process and the few rights municipalities have left in making these decisions.”</p>
<p>Laforet is hoping to meet informally with councillors before the vote, and will be holding a news conference at 5:45 p.m. at city hall. He was also in Thunder Bay last December, part of a province-wide tour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laforet.ca/2011/04/05/thunder-bay-daily-turbine-opposition-bringing-in-expert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wind Concerns Ontario President to Ask Thunder Bay Council to Defer Decision on Settling Wind Developer’s $126 Million Lawsuit Against City</title>
		<link>http://laforet.ca/2011/04/04/wind-concerns-ontario-president-to-ask-thunder-bay-council-to-defer-decision-on-settling-wind-developer%e2%80%99s-126-million-lawsuit-against-city/</link>
		<comments>http://laforet.ca/2011/04/04/wind-concerns-ontario-president-to-ask-thunder-bay-council-to-defer-decision-on-settling-wind-developer%e2%80%99s-126-million-lawsuit-against-city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 06:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Laforet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Concerns Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Thunder Wind Farm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Thunder Wind Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder Bay Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder Bay wind energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder Bay Wind Farm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laforet.ca/?p=1855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Laforet, President of Wind Concerns Ontario is making his second trip to Thunder Bay on Monday April 4th 2011 to encourage Thunder Bay City Council to defer a decision on the terms of settlement to Horizon Wind Inc.’s $126 Million dollar lawsuit against the City until there has been time to fully understand the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Laforet, President of Wind Concerns Ontario is making his second trip to Thunder Bay on Monday April 4<sup>th</sup> 2011 to encourage Thunder Bay City Council to defer a decision on the terms of settlement to Horizon Wind Inc.’s $126 Million dollar lawsuit against the City until there has been time to fully understand the impact of the agreement. News that this item would be considered was not released until Friday April 1<sup>st</sup> 2011 giving residents and concerned stakeholders little time to prepare for this meeting.</p>
<p>‘The message to wind developers can’t be as simple as: “just sue us and we’ll roll over and play dead for you.” Laforet Said.</p>
<p>‘Wind Concerns Ontario is gravely concerned about the precedent the terms of settlement would set for the future of wind development in Thunder Bay, and around Ontario. The public portions of these draft deal would deliver a significant blow to the property rights of wind project participants, citizen involvement in the decision making process and the few rights municipalities have left in these decisions.’ Laforet said ‘While I recognize the City of Thunder Bay’s desire to settle this intimidating lawsuit brought against it by the Horizon Wind, I’m hopeful Councillors will recognize their responsibility to act with diligence and remember their duty is to citizens to do what is best for them and the City. Settling at any cost, with so little time to fully digest the impact certainly isn’t in the best interests of residents.”</p>
<p>Taking the first flight out of Toronto on Monday morning, John Laforet is hopeful he will be able to meet with a number of members of Council in addition to providing a formal deputation prior to the vote. He will also join the Nor&#8217;Wester Mountain Escarpment Protection Committee’s planned rally and Press Conference at City Hall prior to the meeting.</p>
<p>In December of 2010 John Laforet started Wind Concerns Ontario’s province wide tour in Thunder Bay during a two-day visit that involved meetings with local residents, elected officials, experts, a tour of the proposed development and a public meeting at the South Neebing Community Centre.</p>
<p>For more information contact:</p>
<p>John Laforet – President Wind Concerns Ontario</p>
<p>647 724 0600 <a href="mailto:john.laforet@laforet.ca">john.laforet@laforet.ca</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laforet.ca/2011/04/04/wind-concerns-ontario-president-to-ask-thunder-bay-council-to-defer-decision-on-settling-wind-developer%e2%80%99s-126-million-lawsuit-against-city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>London Free Press: Anti-Wind Turbine Activists Take Aim at Ballot Boxes</title>
		<link>http://laforet.ca/2011/03/21/london-free-press-anti-wind-turbine-activists-take-aim-at-ballot-boxes/</link>
		<comments>http://laforet.ca/2011/03/21/london-free-press-anti-wind-turbine-activists-take-aim-at-ballot-boxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Laforet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Concerns Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 Election Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 Ontario Provincial Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Duguid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dalton McGuinty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Liberal Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC Party of Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laforet.ca/?p=1848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By John Miner &#8211; London Free Press After losing one round in court to the McGuinty government, anti-wind-turbine activists can sniff political victory in the air. The wind energy issue has turned red hot in rural areas and there are enough people angry to bring down Liberal candidates, said John Laforet, president of Wind Concerns [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://laforet.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/JLaforetLFP.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1849" title="JLaforetLFP" src="http://laforet.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/JLaforetLFP.jpg" alt="" width="248" height="186" /></a></p>
<p>By John Miner &#8211; London Free Press</p>
<p>After losing one round in court to the McGuinty government, anti-wind-turbine activists can sniff political victory in the air.</p>
<p>The wind energy issue has turned red hot in rural areas and there are enough people angry to bring down Liberal candidates, said John Laforet, president of Wind Concerns Ontario.</p>
<p>“Wind is a far hotter issue on the local level than anything else. The government did it to themselves because they took away local control,” Laforet said on the weekend during a break at Wind Concerns annual meeting in London.</p>
<p>Formed as a coalition in October 2008 with 22 organizations, the group that opposes wind farms now has 57 members.</p>
<p>“Our members are in 35 counties. We think we can play a significant role through direct political action,” Laforet said.</p>
<p>Wind Concerns Ontario is calling for a moratorium on all industrial wind projects until a health study is completed on their impact.</p>
<p>Once that’s done, the coalition wants the McGuinty government to return authority for approving wind turbine development to municipalities, something it stripped in the Green Energy Act.</p>
<p>That was a political blunder, according to Laforet, who was a Liberal party member and former Liberal riding president.</p>
<p>“I resigned to fight them on this issue,” he said.</p>
<p>Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader Tim Hudak has pledged to return control over wind farms to municipalities.</p>
<p>Laforet said the coalition hasn’t endorsed any political party and won’t until platforms have been released.</p>
<p>“We are in talks with the Green party, the NDP and the PCs,” he said.</p>
<p>The anti-wind-turbine activists lost a court challenge in March over how close wind turbines can be from homes.</p>
<p>The court ruled the Ontario government had followed the proper process when it decided the turbines could be 550 metres away.</p>
<p>That ruling may be appealed.</p>
<p>While wind-turbine opponents met Saturday, the Canadian government announced it was investing $117,000 in a start-up company in Middlesex that will build foundation bases for wind turbines and solar installations.</p>
<p>DrillTech Canada is expected to create eight full-time jobs in its first two years of operation.</p>
<p>E-mail <a href="mailto:john.miner@sunmedia.ca">john.miner@sunmedia.ca</a>, or follow <a href="http://twitter.com/johnatlfpress">Johnatlfpress</a> on Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laforet.ca/2011/03/21/london-free-press-anti-wind-turbine-activists-take-aim-at-ballot-boxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Post: No one satisfied with Ontario energy policy</title>
		<link>http://laforet.ca/2011/02/23/national-post-no-one-satisfied-with-ontario-energy-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://laforet.ca/2011/02/23/national-post-no-one-satisfied-with-ontario-energy-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Laforet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Concerns Ontario]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laforet.ca/?p=1830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Tom Blackwell, National Post February 22, 2011 As soon as the Ontario government announced it was halting development of offshore wind farms — a high-profile part of its vaunted, nation-leading green-energy plan — critics wrote off the surprise decision as pure politics. It was, they said, an attempt merely to tamp down vocal wind [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>By Tom Blackwell, National Post February 22, 2011</div>
<div>
<p>As soon as the Ontario government announced it was halting development of offshore wind farms — a high-profile part of its vaunted, nation-leading green-energy plan — critics wrote off the surprise decision as pure politics. It was, they said, an attempt merely to tamp down vocal wind opposition in a handful of Liberal-held ridings expected to be tight races in October’s provincial election.</p>
<p>If a former aide to Brad Duguid, the Liberal energy minister, is to be believed, however, the so-called moratorium mollified no one — and the party’s wind-generated political troubles are only just beginning.</p>
<p>John Laforet, now an ex-Liberal and the provincial head of a network of 57 anti-wind groups, says the organizations have already recruited hundreds of volunteers for a planned campaign to take down Liberal candidates across Ontario.</p>
<p>“It’s truly a multi-front war for the government and they’re losing on all of them,” said Mr. Laforet with characteristic bravado. “We have the strength to work in coalition with like-minded parties and candidates &#8230; If one party is prepared to stand up and take the political risk and support this, they will be handsomely rewarded.”</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the green-energy plan, designed to phase out coal-fired generating plants encourage a range of renewable electricity sources from garbage-dump gas to water power, is also under fire from builders of small-scale solar-energy projects, after the province put curbs on those in the past couple of weeks too.</p>
<p>Mr. Laforet’s movement may or may not wield the power to change election results. As the rest of the country watches Ontario’s ground-breaking experiment in alternative energy, however, the wind farm and solar episodes highlight the web of controversy slowly enveloping a policy that, in some ways, has been surprisingly successful.</p>
<p>Premier Dalton McGuinty said the moratorium on offshore wind turbines is to give time to delve into their environmental impacts; environmental groups say there are none. The government has offered handsome rates to lure producers of green energy into the market; some analysts call the payments exorbitant, for an electricity source that will not meet Ontarians’ energy needs.</p>
<p>“The power system has really been transformed by these changes,” said Tom Adams, a long-time energy-consumer advocate. “They’ve demoted the customer from at one time being the purpose of the power system. The customer has been bumped off the pedestal &#8230; and now the purpose is some sort of green and environmental transformation.”</p>
<p>Mr. Duguid dismisses such critics, though, and argues that Ontario’s aggressive courting of alternative energy has made it a global trailblazer in the field, with the province already generating 1,200 megawatts — about 4% of the total — from wind and other green sources. That is good for the province’s recession-battered economy, already creating thousands of jobs, as well as the environment, he said.</p>
<p>“Show me a previous government in this province or show me a jurisdiction anywhere else in the world that has taken more leadership in moving forward with &#8230; building a clean-energy economy,” said the minister.</p>
<p>Behind it all is 2009’s Green Energy Act and the legislation’s lynchpin program of “feed-in tariffs” (FIT): jargon for guaranteed rates paid by the province — under 20-year contracts — to producers who use alternative energy to feed the electricity grid. The market rate for power in Ontario is currently about 7 cents; FIT offers 13.5 cents for onshore wind, 19 cents (until two weeks ago) for offshore wind, up to 80 cents for solar power and as much as 19 cents for bio-gas.</p>
<p>Hundreds of investors have taken the bait, including heavy hitters like Samsung; about a dozen onshore wind farms are already in place.</p>
<p>At the same time, though, numerous groups have sprung up to oppose the erection of turbines, complaining they are responsible for lost sleep, headaches and dizziness. They warn that the installation of offshore windmills — which must be at least 5 kilometres from land — could churn up harmful pollutants from lake beds, and that their operation threatens birds and bats.</p>
<p>Mr. Laforet, who worked for the energy minister for several months in the mid-2000s, said wind power should be put on hold until more study of its effects on people living nearby is conducted. A review of the medical literature by Ontario’s chief medical officer of health concluded last year, however, that while some people are annoyed by the low-frequency noise, there is no evidence of a link to health problems.</p>
<p>As head of Environmental Defence Canada, Rick Smith is in the unusual position of defending a sort of industrial development against ecological complaints, but he also said the environmental and health concerns around wind farms, after decades of use in Europe, have been proven generally unfounded.</p>
<p>“Some folks have worked up a fixation with windmills that is irrational,” he said. “We have taken a close look. It is such thin gruel that I have to think these folks are motivated by something else — which is just a basic dislike of how they look.”</p>
<p>When the Ontario government removed an earlier moratorium on offshore wind power in 2008, it declared that it had spent a year doing research on various “social and ecological” aspects of the concept and was ready to move ahead.</p>
<p>So what’s the Liberals’ concern now? John Yakabusky, the Conservative energy critic, rhymes off several ridings where proposed offshore wind energy has been particularly controversial and, he says, Liberal ridings are under threat. They include Mr. Duguid’s own Scarborough Centre constituency in Toronto; the Kingston constituency of John Gerretsen, the consumer minister; and the Lake Huron riding held by Carol Mitchell, agriculture minister.</p>
<p>“They’re saying ‘How the hell do we save those ridings,’ ” said Mr. Yakabusky. “A position they said was an absolutely iron-clad part of their energy plan a month ago is now relegated to the dust bin.”</p>
<p>He is a little less emphatic in laying out the Conservatives’ own plan for energy, beyond vowing to end coal generation by 2015 and freezing all wind development until more study is done. The party’s plan will be detailed before the election, though, said Mr. Yakabusky.</p>
<p>For Mr. Adams, the real issues around wind power are not environmental, but economic. The province is offering guaranteed rates rather than taking competitive bids, while wind itself is an inherently intermittent source of electricity, meaning it cannot fill the soon-to-be-closed coal plants’ role as a reliable backup when extra power is needed, he said.</p>
<p>Green-energy investors are also up in arms, including those affected by the government’s decision to not approve any more FIT contracts for small-scale solar unless local utilities have committed first to hook them up to the grid. One group told the London Free Press their $175,000 investment in solar panels — and a second mortgage — were now at risk.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the industry behind offshore wind is still reeling from the unexpected announcement, said John Kourtoff, president of its top company, Trillium Power Wind Corp. Officials quietly referred them to a more detailed notice that said current applications were “cancelled” and that investors would be stripped of the offshore rights the province had tentatively granted them earlier.</p>
<p>As well as threatening the $10 million that Trillium has already invested, the decision is likely to persuade turbine manufacturers to shift promised factories from Ontario to the States, and rob Canada of its one opportunity, with offshore wind, to be at the technological forefront of alternative energy, said Mr. Kourtoff.</p>
<p>“This, today, is the 21st Century version of the Avro Arrow,” he said in reference to the innovative, Canadian-developed fighter jet cancelled in the 1950s. “We’re the leader in offshore wind in North America, and we’re giving the biggest gift to the US.”</p>
<p><em>National Post</em></p>
<p><em>tblackwell@nationalpost.com</em></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laforet.ca/2011/02/23/national-post-no-one-satisfied-with-ontario-energy-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Air Out of the Industrial Wind Lobby Sails in Ontario?</title>
		<link>http://laforet.ca/2011/02/21/is-the-air-out-of-the-industrial-wind-lobby-sails-in-ontario/</link>
		<comments>http://laforet.ca/2011/02/21/is-the-air-out-of-the-industrial-wind-lobby-sails-in-ontario/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Laforet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Concerns Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Duguid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CanWEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dalton McGuinty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gideon Foreman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kris Stephens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offshore Wind Energy Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario Long Term Energy Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Hornung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sierra Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WInd Energy Ontario]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laforet.ca/?p=1826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The announcement that the Ontario Liberal Government recognized the merits of the position Wind Concerns Ontario and its member groups from Lake Superior to Lake Ontario, on Lake Huron, the Georgian Bay, Lake Erie and Lake St. Clair had been advancing is good news. It vindicated our arguments and recognized the flaws in the government [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The announcement that the Ontario Liberal Government recognized the merits of the position Wind Concerns Ontario and its member groups from Lake Superior to Lake Ontario, on Lake Huron, the Georgian Bay, Lake Erie and Lake St. Clair had been advancing is good news. It vindicated our arguments and recognized the flaws in the government position.</p>
<p>By agreeing with our position, the government recognized all these &#8216;wind welfare&#8217; special interests and industry representatives the government either funds or that receive money from special interests tied to the wind industry, just aren&#8217;t credible and can&#8217;t be relied on for reasonable, responsible advice. Simply put, the Government of Ontario acknowledged by backing down that all of those who irresponsibly convinced them they didn&#8217;t need to do science in the first place were wrong and not credible for setting policy going forward.</p>
<p>Is it any wonder then that groups like Environmental Defence found out about the announcement from a reporter &#8211; not the government? Frankly, if I were the Minister of Energy and had been receiving such bad, self interested, incomplete advice from an orgy of special interests who came together to become the &#8220;Green Energy Act Alliance&#8221; I wouldn&#8217;t want to talk to them either as I cleaned up their mess.</p>
<p>The fight on land continues and will be won there as well, because these same special interests who were anti science, anti democracy and pro corporate welfare offshore hold the same views on land and offered even worse bad advice there. We will continue to fight for those who are being harmed on land, to restore local democracy and end the bizarre notions put out by pro industrial wind special interests.</p>
<p>Wind energy isn&#8217;t green, it isn&#8217;t reliable and it shouldn&#8217;t be considered a genuine form of power production because it can&#8217;t stand on its own and virtually every form of power production in the grid today besides wind and large scale solar can and don&#8217;t need subsidies to do it.</p>
<p>Electric generation from wind dates back to 1887 and scientists have been saying since 1865, that wind is an admirable form of energy production and favourable to coal, but the matter of storage (reliability) needs to be sorted out if it is to be a viable alternative. This is a problem that has been worked on and studied for the last one hundred and forty years with no meaningful improvement. Instead, the game plan is to pay for the power even when we don&#8217;t need it at multiples of what it&#8217;s worth, to back up 100% of wind energy&#8217;s capacity with fossil fuels to make up for the dips and surges and build them dangerously close to people because it&#8217;s convenient. The jobs arguments are just lies. The economic impact of wind energy is absolutely negative because of the harm it does to real, private sector, unsubsidized honest work.</p>
<p>In short, instead of becoming a viable form of energy production, industrial wind is an expensive PR statement government&#8217;s make, that has nothing to do with generating clean energy &#8211; because wind turbines can&#8217;t on their own without fossil fuels burning in the background. The negative effects on people, the environment and economy are unconscionable and cannot be allowed to stand.</p>
<p>Those who push industrial wind can&#8217;t honestly claim they care about the environment. They support fossil fuel expansion, oppose environmental assessments, local democracy and refuse independent science on the impacts and benefits of the technology. They are mere puppets for someone&#8217;s profit &#8211; incidentally those who often fund their misinformation campaigns.</p>
<p>This has become a losing battle for the industrial wind industry and its special interest groups. It&#8217;s a battle we need to continue to fight, if our province is to have a bright future and citizens, not special interests and corporate welfare seekers are to control the destiny of our province.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laforet.ca/2011/02/21/is-the-air-out-of-the-industrial-wind-lobby-sails-in-ontario/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

