Comments on: Ignatieff’s ‘Clean Energy’ Proposal Bad Politics and Bad Policy

By: the best way to get rid of acne

the best way to get rid of acne — Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:15:30 +0000

I’ve been surfing on-line greater than three hours nowadays, but I never found any interesting article like yours. It is beautiful worth enough for me. Personally, if all site owners and bloggers made just right content material as you did, the net will probably be a lot more helpful than ever before.

By: the new ipad

the new ipad — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:49:51 +0000

jinky often asked me for a tip as i used to race dogs,i used to tell him never back dogs(knew what i did with them)he ended up going broke in toon with his trophy shop shame

By: Wind is not the solution « Green Grift

Wind is not the solution « Green Grift — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:01:08 +0000

[...] world. Unlike the United States and most of Europe, the bulk of our energy production comes from hydroelectric and nuclear. We do not need [...]

By: David Harris

David Harris — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:58:42 +0000

In my opinion, Michael Ignatieff has shot himself in the foot and is already an unlikable lame duck candidate. Why anyone would consider him as a possible leader of Canada is beyond me. From the very outset, his tactics in beating another non-contender Bob Rae out of the race after Dionne emploded showed he cannot be trusted, and he has proved it repeatedly. The liberals need a real leader if they are ever going to come back again.

By: social activist

social activist — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:22:06 +0000

Michael Ignatieff will say anything such as green initiatives….to get elected…He bullied his way into my father’s riding….He maybe a Harvard Professor…but is not knowledgeable regarding the environment and many Canadians feel he is not qualified to be Prime Minister…. He lives in Yorkville and not in the riding…He smoozes with the high ranking Liberals and the higher ups in society….I personally do not think he is smart enough or cunning enough to be prime minister…ENTITLEMENT AND ARROGANCE ARE NOT LEGITIMATE QUALIFICATIONS.

By: Don’t know where they’re going « Blue Like You

Don’t know where they’re going « Blue Like You — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:04:35 +0000

[...] Ignatieff’s ‘Clean Energy’ Proposal Bad Politics and Bad Policy – John Laforet Filed under Carbon Shaft, Iffy, Iggo Waffles, Kyoto, Liberal Party of Toronto, Peter Principle, environment, hypocrisy Comment (RSS) | Trackback | Permalink [...]

By: Shaken, Not Stirred « Blog Archive « Greening Hollywood

Shaken, Not Stirred « Blog Archive « Greening Hollywood — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:19:22 +0000

[...] A: For Aqua. In the great white north, we have an abundance of the most important resource of all things life on the planet. The majority of Canada’s power production (just under 60%) comes from hydroelectricity. In Ontario, Nuclear and Hydro combined represent 75% of power production – all of which is non carbon emitting. (*Source: laforet.ca) [...]

By: Shaken, Not Stirred « GreenBlogNetwork

Shaken, Not Stirred « GreenBlogNetwork — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:33:46 +0000

By: zen2then

zen2then — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 04:01:06 +0000

Thanks for putting everything in perspective. You are bang on.

By: K. Marshall

K. Marshall — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:39:56 +0000

You are pretty critical of Denmark for not being blessed enough to have the massive rivers that we have that contribute to our status as a hydroelectric powerhouse. Denmark has neither this, nor large quantities of high grade Uranium ore like we do. Its a very, very small country, and frankly only has a few options when it comes to its power generation.

Its true, they could probably build a single nuclear power plant, would could probably power their entire country, but that would take years to develop and build.

Besides. Denmark has 1/6 the population of Canada.

For the record, I’m pro nuclear and hydro as a means for Canada to control our carbon emissions.