Archive for August, 2009
Direct Message To My Readers At Toronto Hydro – I Will Comment On Your Illegal Application Later
‘Never fight a battle where your opponent has everything to lose, because if they fear the prospect of a loss that steep they have nothing to lose in doing everything possible to defeat you.’ – John Laforet
To my readers at Toronto Hydro who have visited over eighty-one (81) blog entries on http://laforet.ca since this morning (it is 10:38 AM). I am sure you’re looking to see what I have to say about your illegal application that John Gerretsen decided to sign off on this week.
It is still illegal, you’re still a cesspool for unethical behaviour, flagrant violators of law and Guildwood residents are angrier than ever before. I still have nothing but contempt for anyone at Toronto Hydro who stubbornly supports wasting $700 million dollars of public money, damaging the environment and building a project we all know (yes you too) will never generate enough electricity to pay for itself.
We will defeat you.
You should know, not one turbine will be going in Lake Ontario off the Scarborough Bluffs, and you’re wasting your time and our money persueing your misadventure off the Bluffs.
We will ensure there will be consequences.
We will respond, and it will be fierce. We’re in this for the long haul and will not allow a single turbine to enter the Lake off our shores as part of your illegal application, through your law breaking, lies and other dirty tricks.
You will be stopped.
David O’Brien has already retired, perhaps it’s time for Chris Tyrrell, Jack Simpson and Joyce McLean to walk the plank before the next round of Scarborough Vs. Toronto Hydro kicks off.
If I were to write a modern ‘Prince’ or ‘Art of War’ this would be a message, I would dedicate to you: ‘Never fight a battle where your opponent has everything to lose, because if they fear the prospect of a loss that steep, they have nothing to lose in doing everything possible to defeat you.’
5 Comments »In North Carolina Representatives Listen To Constituents, Defend Nature Conservation – Ontario MPPs Should Take Notice
Over the course of my political involvement I’ve become less and less impressed with the Parliamentary system as I do believe far too often party discipline and the control the executive branch has over the legislative branch hurts local decision making and local democracy. No where is this clearer than in Ontario, where you have communities on the escarpment fighting aggregate projects that will undoubtedly hurt the environment and their communities, folks in Simcoe fighting a dump site that will poison fresh water and be built against the wishes of the local municipality, folks in York region and north east Scarborough opposing development that risks the Oak Ridges Moraine or the Rouge Park, or the thirty four grassroots groups in twenty one counties across Ontario I am proud to represent in opposing poorly planned and poorly regulated wind developments that have negative health impacts and pose a threat to nature conservation and the local environment.
All of these fights represent instances of communities versus the Provincial government, and on all of these issues the Premier and his government side with the developer, against the local community consensus, and against clear science that in each case demonstrates negative impacts to groundwater, habitat, human health or the environment. Areas with Liberal MPPs get fed this utter crap from their local representatives that they are essentially powerless to do anything because of party discipline and so their communities basically need to just suffer silently, and re-elect them because the other guy is far worse, so they say.
That is in essence the flaw with the Parliamentary system. One tyrant, in this case Premier McGuinty (please someone challenge me on the label tyrant, as I am more than prepared to defend it), makes a decision and tells members of his caucus, each of whom was duly elected, that their opinions are worthless, and although no one actually elected him Premier, he is boss man because they support him and if they dare challenge him by standing up for their constituents he will throw them out of caucus and end their political careers.
Sucks if you’re a citizen, great if you’re the Premier.
In Ontario, residents like me have fought hard and watched Liberal MPP after Liberal MPP turn out to be totally and utterly useless at doing anything of any value for their constituents due to the rigidness of party unity, and have had to take political action, and prepare for larger battles to come in hopes of getting government to listen, or in many cases defeating those MPPs who lack the guts or courage it takes to actually do their jobs.
As a political science geek, I have to tell you I see a lot of value in a congressional system as representatives actually do represent their constituents, and will fight like hell for them because that is how they keep their job. They don’t give speeches saying things like ‘but I can’t do anything for you, because the Premier has all the say and he won’t listen’. They introduce the bill and defend their constituents (at least the good ones do) and they get things done.
North Carolina is the example I am going to use because they did something quite courageous about a month ago that is worth sharing.
In 1983 North Carolina was concerned at the rate of development on mountain ridges, and passed a bill banning further ridge development. 95% of this land is now protected by the state or federal government, kind of like how the Green Belt protects a whole whack of land around the GTA from development. When wind developers wanted to put turbines on mountain ridges, presumably due to the high winds one would expect to find at higher elevations, Assemblymen and Senators at the state legislature said no. They did so, because their constituents have been fighting to protect the mountain ridges from all development and have been aggressively working to conserve the natural beauty that is the mountains.
This July a law passed the North Carolina Senate 45-1 declaring that wind farms are the same as any other unwanted development in this conservation area, and that the only wind turbines that would be allowed would be those shorter than 100 feet, and the power generated could only be used to supply a single home. They’ve basically struck a balance of allowing an individual to build a home based turbine, while blocking the for profit wind factories that are harmful to the environment, disrupt conservation areas and are frankly unwelcome in those parts of the state by local residents.
45-1 means Democrats and Republicans voted for the bill in a bi-partisan effort to protect areas worthy of nature conservation for massive wind projects. They did it because it was what their constituents wanted, and because residents made it clear that nature conservation was more important to them in that particular area than industrial wind factories.
The difference? The people’s elected local representatives have the power. The Governor is directly elected separately from them and does not share a directly linked political fate. The Governor also can’t bribe folks with perks into keeping quiet like a Premier can. If you’re a representative, thats what you do, you represent. You defend your community and fight like hell for them, free of the fear of retribution or undemocratic tactics used so commonly in our party politics to silence dissent.
Back to Ontario, our legislature and Liberal MPPs voted to take away the voices of local residents, they voted to remove environmental protection, to remove local planning and to deny citizens the right to participate in the decision making. Scarborough’s waterfront MPPs were spineless in the face of this local issue, and chose to sit quietly while their party leader literally took shots at residents of their constituencies and the Deputy Premier joined in as well. They are cowards who sat quietly as residents fought to protect the environment from unnecessary degradation.
Today John Gerretsen, the Minister of Environment put his personal approval behind Toronto Hydro’s illegal application and granted them permission to install an anemometer, wasting over a million dollars of taxpayer money to study something the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Federal Government each have already studied and determined there was not sufficient wind to warrant a wind farm.
Through the abuse of the Premier and Deputy Premier and Scarborough’s embarrassing lack of representation, residents were told defending the shoreline, some of the last untouched shoreline on Lake Ontario, and certainly in an urban area, a Provincial heritage site dismissible and not worth even listening too.
In North Carolina, I’m sure state legislators would have stood up for nature conservation, and common sense, in Ontario we’re forced to fight on our own, and defeat those who will claim to want to represent a community, until elected to do so and then fail miserably at the task at hand, breaking the faith with those who sent them and hurting the community in the process. I hope these failures of representatives carry the weight of this damage on their conscience, but sadly, I know enough to know none of them do.
The extreme control of our democratic institutions and using the levers of powers to abuse citizens is what generally results in the defeat of governments in Canada, where the concept of a government MPP speaking up for you is bested left for a political science course, sadly for them, the citizens who operate in the real world don’t care what the Premier would do to you if you actually did their job, and their failure to do their job will result in citizens entrusting someone else to give it their best shot in the next election.
6 Comments »It’s Official By-Election Called in St. Paul’s for September 17th 2009
On September 17th 2009 residents in St. Paul’s will elect a new Member of Provincial Parliament to replace former MPP Michael Bryant. Bryant resigned his seat after a decade in elected office to take on a new role with the City of Toronto as head of Invest Toronto. It is shaping up to be a very interesting fight between Eric Hoskins, the co-founder of War Child, former 2008 federal Liberal candidate in Haldimand Norfolk (roughly Niagara to Lake Erie) and Toronto Sun columnist and local resident Sue-Ann Levy.
I don’t know much about Hoskins except that he has an impressive resume and has done a lot of good humanitarian work. As a City Hall watcher, I am more familiar with Sue-Ann Levy and the strength she brings to opposing what she sees as being harmful for the City or all around bad public policy. The NDP has yet to nominate a candidate as their nomination meeting had been scheduled for September 9th. They will need to speed up their process if they are to compete, something I hope they will do as many of the points the NDP have been making since Horwath’s election as leader have been well put and make a lot of sense to a number of Ontarians.
This will be a dog fight and one that will be fought on a number of issues that favour the opposition. The average income in St. Paul’s is over $100 000 with the median income being closer to $60 000. It can be expected if the average income is over $100 000, and half of resident’s household incomes are over $60 000 that the HST will be a non starter with many as folks with incomes that high are certainly consumers and many due to income will not even be eligible for the money the Provincial government will be handing out to try to ease the pain of this tax increase.
As a heavily urban riding with a number of condo developments, it can be expected condo owners will also overwhelmingly be opposed to the HST as it adds an 8% tax to their monthly maintenance payment, effectively creating a ’13th month’ for the Provincial government’s share.
There is also the matter of E-health, the economy and the general malaise Ontarians tend to have with a second term premier mid way through.
Considering both the Ontario NDP and PC party’s have been carrying very similar messages on the negative impacts of the HST on condo owners and everyday Ontarians and speak in near unison on the e-health scandal and each are calling for a stronger focus on the economy (obviously from different perspectives), if the NDP nominate a quality candidate that matches the calibre of Hoskins and Levy, democracy will be well served on the streets of St. Paul’s.
I’m not calling this for anyone at this point, I’m just saying it’s going to be one heck of a fight, and if Levy brings to it what she’s brought to her column over the years at City Hall – it will certainly be passionate and hard fought.
I know this Torontonian looks forward to watching this play out.
Chris Chopik – Green Party of Ontario
Eric Hoskins – Ontario Liberal Party
Sue-Ann Levy – Ontario Progressive Conservative
Ontario NDP Candidate to be named
3 Comments »
